CRI Profile Protect: Platform Security Capability Group

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Checking the integrity of the existing BIOS or EFI to determine if it is vulnerable to modification and updating firmware can mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring software is up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of successful attacks.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring software is up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of successful attacks.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring software is up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of successful attacks.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Apply vendor security updates to mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse of Office mechanisms that can be used for persistence when an Office-based application is started.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Apply vendor security updates to mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse of Office mechanisms that can be used for persistence when an Office-based application is started.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Apply vendor security updates to mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse of Office mechanisms that can be used for persistence when an Office-based application is started.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Checking the integrity of the existing BIOS or EFI to determine if it is vulnerable to modification and updating firmware can mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Checking the integrity of the existing BIOS or EFI to determine if it is vulnerable to modification and updating firmware can mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to prevent documents from fetching and/or executing malicious payloads.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have made difficult to discover by encrypting, encoding, or obfuscating.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for securely configuring production systems. This includes hardening default configurations and making security-focused setting adjustments to reduce the attack surface, enforce best practices, and protect sensitive data thereby mitigating adversary exploitation.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

TThis diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

TThis diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides for limiting unnecessary software, services, ports, protocols, etc. Ensuring systems only have installed and enabled what is essential for their operation reduces the attack surface and minimizes vulnerabilities, which mitigates a wide range of techniques.

This diagnostic statement provides secure application development, such as implementing token binding strategies to help prevent the malicious use of application access tokens.

This diagnostic statement protects inter-process communication mechanisms from abuse through secure development practices, such as enabling the Hardened Runtime capability when developing applications.

This diagnostic statement provides for secure system development, which includes ensuring that applications do not store sensitive data or valid account credentials insecurely (e.g., plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).

This diagnostic statement provides for secure system development, which includes ensuring that applications do not store sensitive data or valid account credentials insecurely (e.g., plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).

This diagnostic statement provides for secure system development, which includes ensuring that applications do not store sensitive data or valid account credentials insecurely (e.g., plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).

This diagnostic statement provides for secure system development, which includes ensuring that applications do not store sensitive data or valid account credentials insecurely (e.g., plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).

This diagnostic statement protects inter-process communication mechanisms from abuse through secure development practices, such as enabling the Hardened Runtime capability when developing applications.

This diagnostic statement protects inter-process communication mechanisms from abuse through secure development practices, such as enabling the Hardened Runtime capability when developing applications.

This diagnostic statement provides for the implementation of secure development practices, such as implementing token binding strategies which can help prevent malicious use of application access tokens.

This diagnostic statement provides for the implementation of secure development practices, such as implementing token binding strategies which can help prevent malicious use of application access tokens.

This diagnostic statement protects against Exploitation for Credential Access through the implementation of measures in the application to validate authentication requests by enabling one-time passwords, providing timestamps or sequence numbers for messages sent, using digital signatures, and/or using random session keys.

This diagnostic statement protects against Hide Artifacts through the implementation of application security processes and procedures such as installing applications to trusted system folder paths that are already protected by restricted file and directory permissions.

This diagnostic statement protects against Hide Artifacts through the implementation of application security processes and procedures such as installing applications to trusted system folder paths that are already protected by restricted file and directory permissions.

This diagnostic statement protects against Hide Artifacts through the implementation of application security processes and procedures such as installing applications to trusted system folder paths that are already protected by restricted file and directory permissions.

This diagnostic statement provides for secure application development processes and procedures, such as including hash values in manifest files to help prevent side-loading of malicious libraries.

This diagnostic statement provides for secure application development processes and procedures, such as including hash values in manifest files to help prevent side-loading of malicious libraries.

This diagnostic statement protects inter-process communication mechanisms from abuse through secure development practices, such as enabling the Hardened Runtime capability when developing applications.

This diagnostic statement helps protect the modification of property list files (plist files) through secure development practices, such as enabling hardened runtime.

This diagnostic statement helps provides for secure development practices, such as implementing CAPTCHA protection on forms that send messages via SMS.

This diagnostic statement provides for the use of secure development processes and procedures. This includes avoiding publishing sensitive information such as credentials and API keys when uploading to public code repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides for the use of secure development processes and procedures. This includes avoiding publishing sensitive information such as credentials and API keys when uploading to public code repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides for the use of secure development processes and procedures. This includes being cautious when selecting third-party libraries to integrate into applications.

This diagnostic statement provides for the use of secure development processes and procedures. This includes being cautious when selecting third-party libraries to integrate into applications.

This diagnostic statement provides secure application development, such as implementing token binding strategies to help prevent the malicious use of application access tokens.

This diagnostic statement provides for secure system development, which includes ensuring that applications do not store sensitive data or valid account credentials insecurely (e.g., plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).

This diagnostic statement provides for the use of secure development processes and procedures. This includes being cautious when selecting third-party libraries to integrate into applications.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from obfuscated files or information through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from masquerading or manipulated artifacts through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement provides protections for endpoints from masquerading or manipulated artifacts through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from abuse of commands and scripts through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from abuse of commands and scripts through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from abuse of commands and scripts through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from abuse of commands and scripts through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from untrusted files on removable drives through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from introduction of hardware additions through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

This particular diagnostic statement highlights the use of software security testing, code integrity verifications, and vulnerability scanning to mitigate security weaknesses and vulnerabilities in developed code or applications that an adversary may be able to take advantage of.

Use anti-spoofing and email authentication mechanisms to filter messages based on validity checks of the sender domain (using SPF) and integrity of messages (using DKIM). Enabling these mechanisms within an organization (through policies such as DMARC) may enable recipients (intra-org and cross domain) to perform similar message filtering and validation.

Anti-virus can also automatically quarantine suspicious files sent through messages via services, social media , personal webmail, etc.

Anti-virus can also automatically quarantine suspicious files sent through messages via services, social media , personal webmail, etc.

Network intrusion prevention techniques can be utilized to detect traffic for specific adversary malware, in hopes of being mitigated at the network level.

Certain software configuration techniques can be utilized to detect and isolate spearphishing messages found with malicious attachments. Email authentication mechanisms allow malicious links to be filtered, detected and blocked, enabling users not to

Certain software configuration techniques can be utilized to detect and isolate spearphishing messages found with malicious attachments.

Tools that detect and block and remove malware provide protection from users deceived into opening malicious attachments or files that can be found in emails (spearphishing).

Tools that detect and block and remove malware provide protection from users deceived into opening malicious documents, clicking on phishing links, or executing downloaded malware.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files and links, protecting against harmful files, websites, and downloads.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files and links, protecting against harmful files, websites, and downloads.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files and links, protecting against harmful files, websites, and downloads.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have made difficult to discover by encrypting, encoding or obfuscating.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have made difficult to discover by encrypting, encoding or obfuscating.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious Windows 10+ commands that adversaries have made difficult to discover by encrypting, encoding or obfuscating.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have made difficult to discover by encrypting, encoding, or obfuscating.

Heuristic-based malware detection and signatures for observed malware can be used to identify known software packers or artifacts of packing techniques that conceal malicious content.

Antivirus/Antimalware software should be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have made difficult to discover by encrypting, encoding or obfuscating its contents on the system.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have manipulated to appear legitimate or benign.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine suspicious files that adversaries have manipulated to appear legitimate or benign.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine files that have been embedded with malicious commands or scripts.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine files that have been embedded with malicious commands or scripts.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine files that have been embedded with malicious commands or scripts.

Antivirus/Antimalware software can be utilized to detect and quarantine files that have been embedded with malicious commands or scripts.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. An example of this for Pass the Hash is to update software by applying patch KB2871997 to Windows 7 and higher systems, limiting the default access of accounts in the local administrator group.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. An example of this for Group Policy Preferences (GPPs) is to update software by applying patch KB2962486 which prevents credentials from being stored in group policy preferences.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. Regularly updating web browsers, password managers, and related software to the latest versions reduces the risk of vulnerabilities being exploited by attackers to extract stored credentials or steal web session cookies.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. Patching software deployment tools and systems regularly helps prevent potential remote access through Exploitation for Privilege Escalation.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. Patching the BIOS and EFI as necessary helps to prevent adversaries from modifying system firmware.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. Patching the BIOS and EFI as necessary helps prevent adversaries from abusing Pre-OS Boot mechanisms.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. An example of this is installing patches Microsoft has released to help to address abuse of Microsoft Outlook rules.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, exploitation via Outlook Home Page can be prevented by applying Microsoft KB4011162 to systems, which removes the legacy Home Page feature.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, exploitation via Outlook Forms can be mitigated by applying Microsoft KB4011091 which disables custom forms by default.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, Microsoft has released several patches to help address leveraging of Microsoft Office-based applications for persistence between startups.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, applying patches that fix DLL side-loading vulnerabilities mitigates the execution of malicious payloads by side-loading DLLs.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly to include patches that fix DLL side-loading vulnerabilities can help mitigate execution of malicious payloads by hijacking execution flow.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, patching the BIOS and other firmware can help prevent adversaries from overwriting or corrupting firmware.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, to prevent use of application shimming to bypass UAC, Microsoft released patch KB3045645 that will remove the "auto-elevate" flag within the sdbinst.exe.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, upgrading to Windows 8 or later and enabling secure boot can help prevent execution of malicious content via AppInit DLLs.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, performing regular software updates can mitigate potential event triggered execution exploitation risks.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, ensure all browsers and plugins are kept updated to help prevent the exploit phase of Drive-by Compromise.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, keeping system images and software updated and migrating to SNMPv3 can help prevent adversary access of network configuration files.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, keeping system images and software updated and migrating to SNMPv3 can help prevent adversaries from collecting MIB content directly from SNMP-managed devices.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, keeping system images and software updated can help prevent adversaries from collecting data related to managed devices from configuration repositories.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, regularly updating web browsers, password managers, and related software reduces the risk of vulnerabilities being exploited by attackers to extract stored credentials or session cookies.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, regularly updating web browsers, password managers, and related software reduces the risk of vulnerabilities being exploited by attackers to extract stored credentials or session cookies.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, performing regular software updates mitigates adversary exploitation of password storage locations to obtain user credentials.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, ensuring operating systems and browsers are using the most current version helps prevent adversaries from abusing Internet browser extensions or plugins.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating Windows to the latest version and patch level provides the latest protective measures against UAC bypass.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, performing regular software updates is recommended to help mitigate exploitation risk via abuse of elevation control mechanisms.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. A patch management process can help prevent supply chain compromise through checking unused dependencies, unmaintained and/or previously vulnerable dependencies, unnecessary features, components, files, and documentation.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. A patch management process can help prevent supply chain compromise through checking unused dependencies, unmaintained and/or previously vulnerable dependencies, unnecessary features, components, files, and documentation.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. A patch management process can help prevent supply chain compromise through checking unused dependencies, unmaintained and/or previously vulnerable dependencies, unnecessary features, components, files, and documentation.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly by employing patch management for internal enterprise endpoints and servers can mitigate exploitation of remote services.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly by employing patch management for internal enterprise endpoints and servers can help prevent adversary exploitation of a system or application vulnerability to bypass security features.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly by employing patch management for internal enterprise endpoints and servers can help prevent adversary exploitation of a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly by employing patch management for internal enterprise endpoints and servers can help prevent adversary exploitation of software vulnerabilities to elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly by employing patch management for internal enterprise endpoints and servers can help prevent adversary exploitation of software vulnerabilities to collect credentials.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. When it comes to cryptography and key management standards, for the SSH Authorized Keys technique, restricting user and application access to the authorized_keys file can be a mitigating factor for adversaries attempting to modify the SSH authorized_keys file to maintain persistence on a victim host. Linux distributions and macOS commonly use key-based authentication to secure the authentication process of SSH sessions for remote management.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. When it comes to cryptography and key management standards, for the Unsecured Credentials technique, best practice dictates that when possible, store keys on separate cryptographic hardware instead of on the local system to mitigate data theft of credentials stored in unsecure locations.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. When it comes to cryptography and key management standards, for the SSH Hijacking technique, consider that SSH key pairs possess strong passwords and refrain from using key-store technologies such as ssh-agent unless they are properly protected.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. When it comes to cryptography and key management standard as it applies to the Private Keys technique, when possible, consider storing keys on separate cryptographic hardware instead of on the local system. For example, on Windows systems use a TPM to secure keys and other sensitive credential material.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to the theft or forgery of kerberos tickets through AS-REP Roasting, enable AES Kerberos encryption (or another stronger encryption algorithm), rather than RC4, where possible.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to the theft or forgery of kerberos tickets with kerberoasting, enable AES Kerberos encryption (or another stronger encryption algorithm), rather than RC4, where possible.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to the theft or forgery of kerberos tickets with silver tickets, enable AES Kerberos encryption (or another stronger encryption algorithm), rather than RC4, where possible.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to the theft or forgery of authentication certificates, ensure certificates as well as associated private keys are appropriately secured.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to the theft or forgery of kerberos tickets, enable AES Kerberos encryption (or another stronger encryption algorithm), rather than RC4, where possible.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats of network sniffing, ensure that all wired and/or wireless traffic is encrypted appropriately. Use best practices for authentication protocols, such as Kerberos, and ensure web traffic that may contain credentials is protected by SSL/TLS.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to the removal of Linux or Mac System Logs, obfuscate/encrypt event files locally and in transit to avoid giving feedback to an adversary.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to windows event logs removal techniques, obfuscate/encrypt event files locally and in transit to avoid giving feedback to an adversary.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to indicator removal techniques, obfuscate/encrypt event files locally and in transit to avoid giving feedback to an adversary.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to email collection, the use of encryption provides an added layer of security to sensitive information sent over email. Encryption using public key cryptography requires the adversary to obtain the private certificate along with an encryption key to decrypt messages. File encryption should be enforced across email communications containing sensitive information that may be obtained through access to email services.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to email collection, the use of encryption provides an added layer of security to sensitive information sent over email. Encryption using public key cryptography requires the adversary to obtain the private certificate along with an encryption key to decrypt messages. File encryption should be enforced across email communications containing sensitive information that may be obtained through access to email services.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to email collection, the use of encryption provides an added layer of security to sensitive information sent over email. Encryption using public key cryptography requires the adversary to obtain the private certificate along with an encryption key to decrypt messages.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to transmitted data manipulation, encrypt all important data flows to reduce the impact of tailored modifications on data in transit.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to stored data manipulation, consider encrypting important information to reduce an adversary’s ability to perform tailored data modifications.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to data manipulation, consider encrypting important information to reduce an adversary’s ability to perform tailored data modifications.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats to data from information repositories, encrypt data stored at rest in databases.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats of Network Device Configuration Dump, configure SNMPv3 to use the highest level of security (authPriv) available.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats of SNMP (MIB Dump), configure SNMPv3 to use the highest level of security (authPriv) available.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address threats of data collection from configuration repository, configure SNMPv3 to use the highest level of security (authPriv) available.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address data collection from cloud storage, encrypt data stored at rest in cloud storage. Managed encryption keys can be rotated by most providers. At a minimum, ensure an incident response plan to storage breach includes rotating the keys and test for impact on client applications.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address Content Injection threats, ensure that all wired and wireless traffic is encrypted appropriately, employs best practices for authentication protocols such as Kerberos, and protects web traffic containing credentials using SSL/TLS.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address Automated Exfiltration: Traffic Duplication threats, ensure that all wired and wireless traffic is encrypted appropriately, employs best practices for authentication protocols such as Kerberos, and protects web traffic containing credentials using SSL/TLS.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address ARP Cache Poisoning, ensure that all wired and wireless traffic is encrypted appropriately, employs best practices for authentication protocols such as Kerberos, and protects web traffic containing credentials using SSL/TLS.

This diagnostic statement is associated with employing encryption methods to mitigate unauthorized access or theft of data that protect the confidentiality and integrity of data-at-rest, data-in-use, and data-in-transit. To address adversary-in-the-middle threats, the organization ensures that all wired and wireless traffic is encrypted appropriately, employs best practices for authentication protocols such as Kerberos, and protects web traffic containing credentials using SSL/TLS.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Supply Chain Compromise through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Ensuring software management security standards can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise the supply chain.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Subvert Trust Controls through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to subvert trust controls.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Code Signing Policy Modification through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Pre-OS Boot through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software/firmware and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from System Firmware through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify firmware and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Bootkit through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from ROMMONkit through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from TFTP Boot through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Modify System Image through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify the system image.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Patch System Image through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify the system image

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Downgrade System Image through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify the system image.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Firmware Corruption through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify firmware and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from User Execution through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to execute malicious unsigned code.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from User Execution through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to execute malicious unsigned code.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution: ClickOnce through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Server Software Component through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from SQL Stored Procedures through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Transport Agent through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from IIS Components through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Masquerading through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Masquerading: Invalid Code Signature through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Implant Internal Image through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Event Triggered Execution through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Event Triggered Execution: LC_LOAD_DYLIB Addition through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Powershell Profile through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Create or Modify System Process through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Compromise Host Software Binary the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Command and Scripting Interpreter through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining along with disallowing scripts and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries that may abuse command and script interpreters.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Command and Scripting Interpreter through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining along with disallowing scripts and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries that may abuse command and script interpreters.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Command and Scripting Interpreter through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining along with disallowing scripts and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries that may abuse command and script interpreters.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Web Session Cookie through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Baseline security configuration including the automated deletion of cookies can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Transfer Data to Cloud through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that enforce data sharing restrictions to the cloud and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to transfer data to a cloud account.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration including Windows Group Policy or Key Pinning and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify certificate configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Steal Web Session Cookie through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Baseline security configuration including the automated deletion of cookies can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Phishing for Information through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration that uses anti-spoofing, email authentication mechanisms, encryption of credential data, and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to gather information.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Phishing for Information: Spearphishing Attachment through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration that uses anti-spoofing, email authentication mechanisms, external email tracking, encryption of credential data, and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to gather information.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Phishing for Information: Spearphishing Link through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration that uses anti-spoofing, email authentication mechanisms, web filtering, encryption of credential data, and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to gather information.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Phishing through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration that uses anti-spoofing, email authentication mechanisms, blocking of non-essential sites or attachment types, encryption of credential data, and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to access systems.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Phishing through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration that uses anti-spoofing, email authentication mechanisms, blocking of non-essential sites or attachment types, encryption of credential data, and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to access systems

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Office Application Startup through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of Office software and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Office Test through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Modify Cloud Resource Hierarchy through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations for Cloud platforms and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify cloud configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Inter-Process Communication through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Inter-Process Communication: Dynamic Data Exchange through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Impair Defenses through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Impair Defenses: Indicator Blocking through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Impair Defenses: Safe Mode Boot through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Impair Defenses: Downgrade Attack through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Gather Victim Information: DNS through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration including secure policies for DNS servers including Zone Transfer Policies and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Forge Web Credentials through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Web Cookies through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Baseline security configuration including the automated deletion of cookies can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Data from Information Repositories through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that include data retention policies to periodically archive and/or delete data and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to leverage information repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Data from Information Repositories: Customer Relationship Management Software through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that include data retention policies to periodically archive and/or delete data and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to leverage information repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Data from Information Repositories: Data from Configuration Repository through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that include data retention policies to periodically archive and/or delete data and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to leverage information repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Data from Configuration Repository: SNMP (MIB Dump) through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that include allowlist MIB objects and implement SNMP Views can help protect against adversaries attempting to leverage information repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Data from Configuration Repository: Network Device Configuration Dump through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that include allowlist MIB objects and implement SNMP Views, and keeping system images and software up to date can help protect against adversaries attempting to leverage information repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Credentials from Password Stores: Password Managers through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configurations that include secure password storage policies, and keeping system images and software up to date can help protect against adversaries attempting to leverage information repositories.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Create or Modify System Process: Container Service through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baselining and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Sudo and Sudo Caching through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuraiton of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Setuid and Setgid through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Account Discovery through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Account Discovery: Local Account through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Account Discovery: Domain Account through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Account Manipulation through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from BITS Jobs through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Communication Through Removable Media through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Create Account through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Create Account: Domain Account through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Accessibility Features through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium: Exfiltration Over Bluetooth through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Hide Artifacts through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Hide Artifacts: Hidden Users through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Hijack Execution Flow through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Inhibit System Recovery through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Masquerading: Double File Extension through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Modify Authentication Process through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System (including only allowing valid DLLs, secure policies) and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Modify Authentication Process: Password Filter DLL through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System (including only allowing valid DLLs, secure policies) and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Modify Authentication Process: Network Provider DLL through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System (including only allowing valid DLLs, secure policies) and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Network Share Discovery through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from OS Credential Dumping through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from OS Credential Dumping: Cached Domain Credentials through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Remote Service Session Hijacking through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Remote Service Session Hijacking: RDP Hijacking through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Remote Services through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Remote Desktop Protocol through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Scheduled Task/Job through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System including running of scheduled tasks as authenticated user instead of SYSTEM and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Scheduled Task/Job: At through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System including running of scheduled tasks as authenticated user instead of SYSTEM and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System including running of scheduled tasks as authenticated user instead of SYSTEM and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Unsecured Credentials through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

This diagnostic statement provides protection from Unsecured Credentials: Bash History through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and elevate privileges.

Use anti-spoofing and email authentication mechanisms to filter messages based on validity checks of the sender domain (using SPF) and integrity of messages (using DKIM). Enabling these mechanisms within an organization (through policies such as DMARC) may enable recipients (intra-org and cross domain) to perform similar message filtering and validation.

Anti-virus can also automatically quarantine suspicious files sent through messages via services, social media , personal webmail, etc.

Anti-virus can also automatically quarantine suspicious files sent through messages via services, social media , personal webmail, etc.

Network intrusion prevention techniques can be utilized to detect traffic for specific adversary malware, in hopes of being mitigated at the network level.

Certain software configuration techniques can be utilized to detect and isolate spearphishing messages found with malicious attachments. Email authentication mechanisms allow malicious links to be filtered, detected and blocked, enabling users not to

Certain software configuration techniques can be utilized to detect and isolate spearphishing messages found with malicious attachments.

Network intrusion prevention techniques can be utilized to remove malicious email attachment or link to prevent/block activity where phishing messages can be sent to users.

Network intrusion prevention techniques can be utilized to remove malicious email attachment or link to prevent/block activity where phishing messages can be sent to users.

Tools that detect and block and remove malware provide protection from users deceived into opening malicious attachments or files that can be found in emails (spearphishing).

Tools that detect and block and remove malware provide protection from users deceived into opening malicious documents, clicking on phishing links, or executing downloaded malware.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring operating systems and software are using the most current version can mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Checking the integrity of the existing BIOS or EFI to determine if it is vulnerable to modification and updating firmware can mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Apply vendor security updates to mitigate risks of exploitation and/or abuse of Office mechanisms that can be used for persistence when an Office-based application is started.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring software is up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of successful attacks.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Continuous monitoring of vulnerability sources and the use of automatic and manual code review tools can mitigate Supply Chain Compromise.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Continuous monitoring of vulnerability sources and the use of automatic and manual code review tools can mitigate Supply Chain Compromise.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring software is up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of successful attacks.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Ensuring software is up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of successful attacks.

This diagnostic statement provides for identifying and remediating vulnerabilities as part of the SDLC. Continuous monitoring of vulnerability sources and the use of automatic and manual code review tools can mitigate Supply Chain Compromise.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

Mobile code procedures address specific actions taken to prevent the development, acquisition, and introduction of unacceptable mobile code within organizational systems, including requiring mobile code to be digitally signed by a trusted source.

This diagnostic statement protects against Account Manipulation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to manipulate accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Account Manipulation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to register devices.

This diagnostic statement protects against Account Manipulation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to manipulate accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Account Manipulation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to add permissions to accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Account Manipulation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to manipulate accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Account Manipulation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to manipulate accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Brute Force through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to brute force credentials.

This diagnostic statement protects against Brute Force through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to brute force credentials.

This diagnostic statement protects against Brute Force through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to brute force credentials.

This diagnostic statement protects against Brute Force through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing strong encryption keys and limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to guess credentials.

This diagnostic statement protects against Brute Force through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to brute force credentials.

This diagnostic statement protects against Create Account through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to create accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Create Account through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to create accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Create Account through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to create accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Create Account through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to create accounts.

This diagnostic statement protects against Data Destruction through the use of revocation of keys and key management used in multi-factor authentication. Employing key protection strategies, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to destroy data.

This diagnostic statement protects against Data from Cloud Storage through the use of revocation of keys and key management used in multi-factor authentication. Employing key protection strategies, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to access data from cloud storage.

This diagnostic statement protects against Code Repositories through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies such as removing keys from code repositories, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to glean credentials from code repositories.

This diagnostic statement protects against Code Repositories through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies such as removing keys from information repositories, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to glean credentials from code repositories.

This diagnostic statement protects against Email Collection through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies such as ensuring proper encryption methods and key management for those used in email along with policies for sending cryptographic material over email, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to glean credentials from emails.

This diagnostic statement protects against Email Collection through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies such as ensuring proper encryption methods and key management for those used in email along with policies for sending cryptographic material over email, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to glean credentials from emails.

This diagnostic statement protects against External Remote Services through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for those used in external remote services, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to access external remote services.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify Authentication Process through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to use hybrid identities.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify Authentication Process through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes (including multi-factor authentication or MFA), limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to bypass or generate MFA requests.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify Authentication Process through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in managing and signing images, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify or patch network device authentication processes in those system images.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify Authentication Process through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in PAM modules and its authentication process, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify the PAM processes.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify Authentication Process through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify domain controller authentication mechanisms.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify Authentication Process through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify authentication processes.

This diagnostic statement protects against Downgrade System Image through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in managing and signing images, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify or patch system images.

This diagnostic statement protects against Patch System Image through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in managing and signing images, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify or patch system images.

This diagnostic statement protects against Modify System Image through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in managing and signing images, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to modify or patch system images.

This diagnostic statement protects against Multi-Factor Authentication Request Generation through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes (including multi-factor authentication or MFA), limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to bypass or generate MFA requests.

This diagnostic statement protects against Network Address Translation Traversal through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes (including multi-factor authentication or MFA for network devices using TACACS+/RADIUS), limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to perform Network Address Translation Traversal.

This diagnostic statement protects against Network Boundary Bridging through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies and key management for key material used in identity management and authentication processes (including multi-factor authentication or MFA for network devices using TACACS+/RADIUS), limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to perform Network Boundary Bridging.