1. Home
  2. ATT&CK Techniques
  3. T1574 Hijack Execution Flow

T1574 Hijack Execution Flow

Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking the way operating systems run programs. Hijacking execution flow can be for the purposes of persistence, since this hijacked execution may reoccur over time. Adversaries may also use these mechanisms to elevate privileges or evade defenses, such as application control or other restrictions on execution.

There are many ways an adversary may hijack the flow of execution, including by manipulating how the operating system locates programs to be executed. How the operating system locates libraries to be used by a program can also be intercepted. Locations where the operating system looks for programs/resources, such as file directories and in the case of Windows the Registry, could also be poisoned to include malicious payloads.

View in MITRE ATT&CK®

CRI Profile Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
PR.PS-06.01 Secure SDLC process Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
Comments
This diagnostic statement provides for secure application development processes and procedures, such as including hash values in manifest files to help prevent side-loading of malicious libraries.
References
    PR.PS-01.08 End-user device protection Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
    Comments
    This diagnostic statement protects endpoints from certain types of behaviors related to process injection/memory tampering through configuration requirements, connection requirements, and other mechanisms to protect network, application, and data integrity.
    References
      DE.CM-09.01 Software and data integrity checking Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
      Comments
      This diagnostic statement protects against Hijack Execution Flow through the use of verifying integrity of software/firmware, loading software that is trusted, ensuring privileged process integrity and checking software signatures.
      References
        ID.RA-01.03 Vulnerability management Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
        Comments
        This diagnostic statement provides protection from vulnerabilities in exposed applications from across the organization through the use of tools that scan for and review vulnerabilities along with patch management and remediation of those vulnerabilities.
        References
          PR.AA-05.01 Access privilege limitation Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
          Comments
          This diagnostic statement describes the implementation of least privilege principle, which can be applied to limiting permissions through role-based access controls, file and directory permissions, and the execution of systems and services. Ensure proper permissions are set for Registry hives to prevent users from modifying keys for logon scripts that may lead to persistence.
          References
            PR.PS-02.01 Patch identification and application Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
            Comments
            This diagnostic statement is related to the implementation of a patch management program. Applying patches and upgrades for products and systems provided by vendors mitigates the risk of adversaries exploiting known vulnerabilities. For example, updating software regularly to include patches that fix DLL side-loading vulnerabilities can help mitigate execution of malicious payloads by hijacking execution flow.
            References
              PR.PS-01.03 Configuration deviation Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
              Comments
              This diagnostic statement provides protection from Hijack Execution Flow through the implementation of security configuration baselines for OS, software, file integrity monitoring and imaging. Security baseline configuration of the Operating System and integrity checking can help protect against adversaries attempting to compromise and modify software and its configurations.
              References
                PR.AA-01.01 Identity and credential management Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                Comments
                This diagnostic statement protects against Hijack Execution Flow through the use of hardened access control policies, secure defaults, password complexity requirements, multifactor authentication requirements, and removal of terminated accounts.
                References
                  PR.PS-06.07 Development and operational process alignment Mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                  Comments
                  This diagnostic statement protects against Hijack Execution Flow through the use of DevSecOps, secure development lifecycle, and application developer guidance. Exploitable weaknesses can be mitigated through secure code, reduced vulnerabilities, and secure design principles.
                  References

                    NIST 800-53 Mappings

                    Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
                    CA-07 Continuous Monitoring mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    CM-06 Configuration Settings mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    CM-05 Access Restrictions for Change mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    SI-02 Flaw Remediation mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    RA-05 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    CM-08 System Component Inventory mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    SI-10 Information Input Validation mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    SI-03 Malicious Code Protection mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    SI-07 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    CM-02 Baseline Configuration mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    CM-02 Baseline Configuration mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    IA-02 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    CM-07 Least Functionality mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    SI-04 System Monitoring mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    AC-02 Account Management mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    AC-03 Access Enforcement mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    AC-04 Information Flow Enforcement mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    AC-05 Separation of Duties mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    AC-06 Least Privilege mitigates T1574 Hijack Execution Flow

                    VERIS Mappings

                    Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
                    action.hacking.variety.Hijack To assume control over and steal functionality for an illicit purpose (e.g. Hijacking phone number intercept SMS verification codes) related-to T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    action.hacking.variety.Unknown Unknown related-to T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    action.hacking.variety.XML injection XML injection. Child of 'Exploit vuln'. related-to T1574 Hijack Execution Flow

                    Azure Mappings

                    Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
                    file_integrity_monitoring Microsoft Defender for Cloud: File Integrity Monitoring technique_scores T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    Comments
                    This control can detect hijacked execution flow.
                    References
                    1. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/defender-for-cloud/file-integrity-monitoring-overview
                    defender_for_app_service Microsoft Defender for Cloud: Defender for App Service technique_scores T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    Comments
                    This control only addresses a minority of this technique's procedure examples and provides minimal detection of some of its sub-techniques resulting in an overall Minimal score.
                    References
                    1. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/defender-for-cloud/alerts-reference
                    2. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/defender-for-cloud/defender-for-app-service-introduction
                    3. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/app-service/
                    4. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/defender-for-cloud/plan-defender-for-servers

                    GCP Mappings

                    Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
                    google_secops Google Security Operations technique_scores T1574 Hijack Execution Flow
                    Comments
                    Google Security Ops is able to trigger alerts based on suspicious system processes that could indicate hijacking via malicious payloads. This technique was scored as minimal based on low or uncertain detection coverage factor. https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules/blob/783e0e5947774785db1c55041b70176deeca6f46/soc_prime_rules/threat_hunting/antivirus/detects_powershell_attack__via_av_ids.yaral
                    References
                    1. ['https://cloud.google.com/security/products/security-operations'
                    2. 'https://cloud.google.com/chronicle/docs/secops/secops-overview'
                    3. 'https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules']

                    ATT&CK Subtechniques

                    Technique ID Technique Name Number of Mappings
                    T1574.007 Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable 20
                    T1574.011 Services Registry Permissions Weakness 4
                    T1574.001 DLL Search Order Hijacking 17
                    T1574.014 AppDomainManager 13
                    T1574.008 Path Interception by Search Order Hijacking 19
                    T1574.006 Dynamic Linker Hijacking 10
                    T1574.005 Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness 16
                    T1574.010 Services File Permissions Weakness 14
                    T1574.013 KernelCallbackTable 10
                    T1574.009 Path Interception by Unquoted Path 19
                    T1574.002 DLL Side-Loading 16
                    T1574.004 Dylib Hijacking 16
                    T1574.012 COR_PROFILER 13