Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop.(Citation: volexity_0day_sophos_FW) Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence.
In some cases, adversaries may abuse inactive accounts: for example, those belonging to individuals who are no longer part of an organization. Using these accounts may allow the adversary to evade detection, as the original account user will not be present to identify any anomalous activity taking place on their account.(Citation: CISA MFA PrintNightmare)
The overlap of permissions for local, domain, and cloud accounts across a network of systems is of concern because the adversary may be able to pivot across accounts and systems to reach a high level of access (i.e., domain or enterprise administrator) to bypass access controls set within the enterprise.(Citation: TechNet Credential Theft)
View in MITRE ATT&CK®Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR.IR-01.05 | Remote access protection | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement implements security controls and restrictions for remote user access to systems. Remote user access control involves managing and securing how users remotely access systems, such as through encrypted connections and account use policies, which help prevent adversary access.
References
|
DE.CM-03.03 | Privileged account monitoring | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement implements mechanisms and tools to mitigate potential misuse of privileged users and accounts. Continuous monitoring of role and attribute assignments and activity is essential to prevent and detect unauthorized access or misuse.
References
|
PR.PS-06.01 | Secure SDLC process | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement provides for secure system development, which includes ensuring that applications do not store sensitive data or valid account credentials insecurely (e.g., plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).
References
|
PR.AA-05.02 | Privileged system access | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Valid Accounts through the use of privileged account management and the use of multi-factor authentication.
References
|
DE.CM-06.02 | Third-party access monitoring | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Valid Accounts through the use of privileged account management. Employing auditing, privilege access management, and just in time access protects against adversaries trying to obtain illicit access to critical systems.
References
|
PR.AA-02.01 | Authentication of identity | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement provides protection from Valid Accounts through the implementation of privileged account management controls to limit account access. Employing limitations to specific accounts, provisioning accounts, access control mechanisms, and auditing the attribution logs provides protection against adversaries attempting to use existing accounts.
References
|
PR.PS-01.07 | Cryptographic keys and certificates | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Valid Accounts through the use of revocation of keys and key management. Employing key protection strategies for key material used as part of multi-factor authentication for valid accounts, limitations to specific accounts along with access control mechanisms provides protection against adversaries attempting to use valid accounts.
References
|
PR.AA-05.03 | Service accounts | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement describes how the organization establishes security standards based on industry guidelines to institute strict controls over service account (i.e., accounts used by systems to access other systems).
References
|
PR.AA-01.02 | Physical and logical access | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement describes how the organization ensures users are identified and authenticated before accessing systems, applications, and hardware, with logical access controls permitting access only to authorized individuals with legitimate business needs. Logical access controls in relation to systems can refer to the use of MFA, user account management, and other role-based access control mechanisms to enforce policies for authentication and authorization of user accounts.
References
|
PR.AA-03.01 | Authentication requirements | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement describes how the organization implement appropriate authentication requirements, including selecting mechanisms based on risk, utilizing multi-factor authentication where necessary, and safeguarding the storage of authenticators like pins and passwords to protect sensitive access credentials.
References
|
PR.AA-05.04 | Third-party access management | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement includes implementation of controls for third-party access to an organization’s systems. Conditional access policies can be used to block logins from non-compliant devices or from outside defined IP ranges.
References
|
PR.AA-01.01 | Identity and credential management | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Valid Accounts through the use of hardened access control policies, secure defaults, password complexity requirements, multifactor authentication requirements, and removal of terminated accounts.
References
|
PR.PS-06.07 | Development and operational process alignment | Mitigates | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Valid Accounts through the use of DevSecOps, secure development lifecycle, and application developer guidance. Exploitable weaknesses can be mitigated through secure code, reduced vulnerabilities, and secure design principles.
References
|
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
action.hacking.variety.Backdoor | Hacking action that creates a backdoor for use. | related-to | T1078 | Valid Accounts | |
action.hacking.variety.Use of stolen creds | Use of stolen or default authentication credentials (including credential stuffing) | related-to | T1078 | Valid Accounts | |
action.hacking.vector.Backdoor | Hacking actions taken through a backdoor. C2 is only used by malware. | related-to | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
defender_for_storage | Microsoft Defender for Cloud: Defender for Storage | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control provides minimal detection for its procedure examples. Additionally, it is able to detect only one of its sub-techniques (Cloud Accounts) resulting in a Minimal Coverage score and consequently an overall score of Minimal.
References
|
advanced_threat_protection_for_azure_sql_database | Advanced Threat Protection for Azure SQL Database | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control only provides alerts for a set of Azure database offerings. Databases that have been deployed to endpoints within Azure or third-party databases deployed to Azure do not generate alerts for this control.
References
|
ai_security_recommendations | Microsoft Defender for Cloud: AI Security Recommendations | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control's recommendations about removing deprecated and external accounts with sensitive permissions from your subscription can lead to mitigating the Cloud Accounts sub-technique of this technique. Because this is a recommendation and has low coverage, it is assessed as Minimal.
References
|
alerts_for_azure_cosmos_db | Alerts for Azure Cosmos DB | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control's detection is specific to the Cosmos DB and therefore provides minimal overall detection coverage for Valid Accounts resulting in a Minimal score. A relevant alert is "Access from an unusual location to a Cosmos DB account".
References
|
alerts_for_windows_machines | Alerts for Windows Machines | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control is able to detect some of this technique's sub-techniques resulting in a Partial Coverage score and consequently an overall score of Partial.
References
|
azure_policy | Azure Policy | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control can protect against abuse of valid accounts.
References
|
azure_role_based_access_control | Azure Role-Based Access Control | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control only provides protection for one of this technique's sub-techniques while not providing any protection for its procedure examples (due to being specific to Azure AD) nor its remaining sub-technqiues. Consequently its coverage score factor is Minimal, resulting in a Minimal score.
References
|
defender_for_azure_sql_databases | Microsoft Defender for Azure SQL Databases | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control can protect against abuse of valid accounts.
References
|
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
artifact_analysis | Artifact Analysis | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
Artifact Analysis scans container images uploaded to Artifact Registry or Container Registry (deprecated) for vulnerabilities that could potentially be used to escalate privileges, such as default accounts with root permissions in Docker containers. Due to the medium threat protection coverage and scan results being available 48 hours after completion, this control was scored as partial.
References
|
mandiant_digital_threatmon | Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring continually monitors for compromised credentials and data leaks on both the open and dark web. This control may protect against credential abuse by alerting on leaked credentials. Since this control must depend on accessible sources for dumps, it does not protect against credentials that have been collected for a campaign but never posted, so the score is partial.
References
|
cloud_asset_inventory | Cloud Asset Inventory | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control may be able to detect when adversaries use valid cloud accounts to elevate privileges through manipulation of IAM or access policies. This monitoring can be fine tuned to specific assets, policies, and organizations.
References
|
cloud_endpoints | Cloud Endpoints | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
The Cloud Endpoints capability provides support for multiple authentication methods, including API keys and Google ID tokens. Implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) across account types, including local, domain, and cloud accounts, can prevent unauthorized access even if credentials are compromised.
References
|
cloud_identity | Cloud Identity | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control can be used to mitigate malicious attacks of cloud accounts by implementing multi-factor authentication techniques or password policies.
References
|
gke_enterprise | GKE Enterprise | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
GKE Enterprise incorporates the Anthos Config Management feature to create and manage Kubernetes objects across multiple clusters at once. PodSecurityPolicies can be enforced to prevent Pods from using the root Linux user. Based on the medium detection coverage, this was scored as partial.
References
|
google_secops | Google Security Operations | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
Google Security Ops is able to trigger an alert based on RDP logons from non-private IP ranges.
This technique was scored as minimal based on low or uncertain detection coverage factor.
https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules/blob/783e0e5947774785db1c55041b70176deeca6f46/soc_prime_rules/active_directory_security/security/remote_desktop_from_internet__via_audit.yaral
References
|
identity_and_access_management | Identity and Access Management | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control may mitigate the impact of compromised valid accounts by enabling fine-grained access policies and implementing least-privilege policies. MFA can provide protection against an adversary that obtains valid credentials by requiring the adversary to complete an additional authentication process before access is permitted.
References
|
identity_aware_proxy | Identity Aware Proxy | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
IAP applies the relevant IAM policy to check if the user is authorized to access the requested resource. If the user has the IAP-secured Web App User role on the Cloud console project where the resource exists, they're authorized to access the application. This control can mitigate against adversaries that try to obtain credentials of accounts, including cloud accounts.
References
|
identity_platform | Identity Platform | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
Identity Platform lets you add Google-grade authentication to your apps and services, making it easier to secure user accounts and securely managing credentials. MFA can provide protection against an adversary that obtains valid credentials by requiring the adversary to complete an additional authentication process before access is permitted.
References
|
policy_intelligence | Policy Intelligence | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a cloud account by gaining access through means of Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Policy Intelligence role recommendations generated by IAM Recommender help enforce least privilege principals to ensure that permission levels are properly managed.
References
|
resource_manager | Resource Manager | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
Adversaries may attempt to obtain credentials of existing account through privilege escalation or defense evasion. IAM audit logging in GCP can be used to determine roles and permissions, along with routinely checking user permissions to ensure only the expected users have the ability to list IAM identities or otherwise discover cloud accounts.
References
|
vpc_service_controls | VPC Service Controls | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control is able to mitigate against abuse of compromised valid accounts by restricting access from those accounts to resources contained within the VPC perimeter the account belongs to. Resources and services contained in other VPC networks also cannot be accessed by user accounts that are not within the VPC network perimeter.
References
|
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
amazon_cognito | Amazon Cognito | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control provides partial protection for one of this technique's sub-techniques and a few of its procedure examples resulting in an overall Minimal protection score.
References
|
amazon_guardduty | Amazon GuardDuty | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
GuardDuty implements a finding that flags occurrences unattended behavior from an IAM User in the Account.
PenTest:IAMUser/KaliLinux, PenTest:IAMUser/ParrotLinux, PenTest:IAMUser/PentooLinux, Policy:IAMUser/RootCredentialUsage, PrivilegeEscalation:IAMUser/AdministrativePermissions, UnauthorizedAccess:IAMUser/ConsoleLogin, UnauthorizedAccess:IAMUser/ConsoleLoginSuccess.B, UnauthorizedAccess:IAMUser/MaliciousIPCaller, UnauthorizedAccess:IAMUser/MaliciousIPCaller.Custom, UnauthorizedAccess:IAMUser/TorIPCaller, Policy:S3/AccountBlockPublicAccessDisabled, Policy:S3/BucketAnonymousAccessGranted, Policy:S3/BucketBlockPublicAccessDisabled, Policy:S3/BucketPublicAccessGranted, CredentialAccess:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior, DefenseEvasion:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior, Discovery:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior, Exfiltration:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior, Impact:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior, Persistence:IAMUser/AnomalousBehavior, Recon:IAMUser/MaliciousIPCaller, Recon:IAMUser/MaliciousIPCaller.Custom, UnauthorizedAccess:IAMUser/InstanceCredentialExfiltration
References
|
aws_config | AWS Config | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control provides significant coverage for one of this technique's sub-techniques, resulting in an overall score of Minimal.
References
|
aws_identity_and_access_management | AWS Identity and Access Management | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
|
aws_identity_and_access_management | AWS Identity and Access Management | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
|
aws_iot_device_defender | AWS IoT Device Defender | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control provides partial detection capability for one of this technique's sub-techniques and a few of its procedure examples resulting in an overall Minimal protection score.
References
|
aws_iot_device_defender | AWS IoT Device Defender | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control provides partial protection for one of this technique's sub-techniques and a few of its procedure examples resulting in an overall Minimal protection score.
References
|
aws_organizations | AWS Organizations | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
This control may protect against malicious use of cloud accounts but may not mitigate exploitation of local, domain, or default accounts present within deployed resources.
References
|
aws_security_hub | AWS Security Hub | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Comments
AWS Security Hub detects suspicious activity by AWS accounts which could indicate valid accounts being leveraged by an adversary. AWS Security Hub provides these detections with the following managed insights.
AWS principals with suspicious access key activity Credentials that may have leaked AWS resources with unauthorized access attempts IAM users with suspicious activity
AWS Security Hub also performs checks from the AWS Foundations CIS Benchmark and PCI-DSS security standard that, if implemented, would help towards detecting the misuse of valid accounts. AWS Security Hub provides these detections with the following checks.
3.1 Ensure a log metric filter and alarm exist for unauthorized API calls 3.2 Ensure a log metric filter and alarm exist for Management Console sign-in without MFA 3.3 Ensure a log metric filter and alarm exist for usage of "root" account 3.4 Ensure a log metric filter and alarm exist for IAM policy changes 3.6 Ensure a log metric filter and alarm exist for AWS Management Console authentication failures [PCI.CW.1] A log metric filter and alarm should exist for usage of the "root" user
By monitoring the root account, activity where accounts make unauthorized API calls, and changes to IAM permissions among other things, it may be possible to detect valid accounts that are being misused and are potentially compromised.
This is scored as Minimal because it only supports a subset of the sub-techniques.
References
|
aws_single_sign-on | AWS Single Sign-On | technique_scores | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
|
Technique ID | Technique Name | Number of Mappings |
---|---|---|
T1078.001 | Default Accounts | 27 |
T1078.002 | Domain Accounts | 26 |
T1078.004 | Cloud Accounts | 61 |
T1078.003 | Local Accounts | 29 |