T1071 Application Layer Protocol

Adversaries may communicate using OSI application layer protocols to avoid detection/network filtering by blending in with existing traffic. Commands to the remote system, and often the results of those commands, will be embedded within the protocol traffic between the client and server.

Adversaries may utilize many different protocols, including those used for web browsing, transferring files, electronic mail, DNS, or publishing/subscribing. For connections that occur internally within an enclave (such as those between a proxy or pivot node and other nodes), commonly used protocols are SMB, SSH, or RDP.(Citation: Mandiant APT29 Eye Spy Email Nov 22)

View in MITRE ATT&CK®

VERIS Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
action.hacking.variety.Other Other related-to T1071 Application Layer Protocol
action.hacking.variety.Evade Defenses Modification of the action (rather than the system, as in 'Disable controls') to avoid detection. related-to T1071 Application Layer Protocol
action.hacking.vector.Other network service Network service that is not remote access or a web application. related-to T1071 Application Layer Protocol
action.malware.variety.C2 Malware creates Command and Control capability for malware. Child of 'Backdoor or C2'. related-to T1071 Application Layer Protocol

GCP Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
cloud_ngfw Cloud Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)_ technique_scores T1071 Application Layer Protocol
Comments
Cloud NGFW can allow or deny traffic based on the traffic's protocol, destination ports, sources, and destinations. This functionality can be used to block malicious or unwanted traffic leveraging application layer protocols. Given this supports all sub-techniques, the mapping is given a score of Significant.
References
google_secops Google Security Operations technique_scores T1071 Application Layer Protocol
Comments
Google Security Ops is able to trigger an alert based on suspicious modifications to the network infrastructure. This technique was scored as minimal based on low or uncertain detection coverage factor. https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules/tree/main/gcp_cloudaudit https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules/blob/main/gcp_cloudaudit/gcp_vpc_network_changes.yaral
References

ATT&CK Subtechniques

Technique ID Technique Name Number of Mappings
T1071.004 DNS 2
T1071.005 Publish/Subscribe Protocols 3
T1071.003 Mail Protocols 1
T1071.002 File Transfer Protocols 1
T1071.001 Web Protocols 6