Adversaries may abuse a container administration service to execute commands within a container. A container administration service such as the Docker daemon, the Kubernetes API server, or the kubelet may allow remote management of containers within an environment.(Citation: Docker Daemon CLI)(Citation: Kubernetes API)(Citation: Kubernetes Kubelet)
In Docker, adversaries may specify an entrypoint during container deployment that executes a script or command, or they may use a command such as <code>docker exec</code> to execute a command within a running container.(Citation: Docker Entrypoint)(Citation: Docker Exec) In Kubernetes, if an adversary has sufficient permissions, they may gain remote execution in a container in the cluster via interaction with the Kubernetes API server, the kubelet, or by running a command such as <code>kubectl exec</code>.(Citation: Kubectl Exec Get Shell)
View in MITRE ATT&CK®Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR.AA-05.02 | Privileged system access | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Container Administration Command through the use of privileged account management and the use of multi-factor authentication.
References
|
DE.CM-06.02 | Third-party access monitoring | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Container Administration Command through the use of privileged account management. Employing auditing, privilege access management, and just in time access protects against adversaries trying to obtain illicit access to critical systems.
References
|
PR.AA-05.01 | Access privilege limitation | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement describes the implementation of least privilege principle, which can be applied to limiting permissions through role-based access controls, file and directory permissions, and the execution of systems and services. An adversary must already have high-level, admin or root level access on a local system to make full use of these ATT&CK techniques. Restrict users and accounts to the least privileges they require can help mitigate these techniques.
References
|
PR.AA-01.02 | Physical and logical access | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement describes how the organization ensures users are identified and authenticated before accessing systems, applications, and hardware, with logical access controls permitting access only to authorized individuals with legitimate business needs. Logical access controls in relation to systems can refer to the use of MFA, user account management, and other role-based access control mechanisms to enforce policies for authentication and authorization of user accounts.
References
|
PR.AA-03.01 | Authentication requirements | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement describes how the organization implement appropriate authentication requirements, including selecting mechanisms based on risk, utilizing multi-factor authentication where necessary, and safeguarding the storage of authenticators like pins and passwords to protect sensitive access credentials.
References
|
PR.IR-01.02 | Network device configurations | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement provides protection through secure network device configurations (e.g., firewall rules, ports, and protocols) aligned to security baselines. Using network appliances to limit communications with container services can prevent adversary abuse of container administration.
References
|
PR.IR-01.03 | Network communications integrity and availability | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Container Administration Command through the use of secure network configurations, architecture, implementations of zero trust architecture, and segmentation.
References
|
PR.IR-01.05 | Remote access protection | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement implements security controls and restrictions for remote user access to systems. Remote user access control involves managing and securing how users remotely access systems, such as through encrypted connections and account use policies, which help prevent adversary access.
References
|
PR.IR-01.06 | Production environment segregation | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement provides protections for production environments. Measures such as network segmentation and access control reduce the attack surface, restrict movement by adversaries, and protect critical assets and data from compromise.
References
|
PR.AA-01.01 | Identity and credential management | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Container Administration Command through the use of hardened access control policies, secure defaults, password complexity requirements, multifactor authentication requirements, and removal of terminated accounts.
References
|
PR.PS-01.08 | End-user device protection | Mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Container Administration Command through the use of limiting access to resources to only authorized devices, management of personal computing devices, network intrusion prevention, and the use of antimalware.
References
|
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM-06 | Configuration Settings | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
AC-17 | Remote Access | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
SI-10 | Information Input Validation | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
SI-07 | Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
CM-07 | Least Functionality | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
AC-02 | Account Management | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
AC-03 | Access Enforcement | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
AC-04 | Information Flow Enforcement | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
AC-05 | Separation of Duties | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
AC-06 | Least Privilege | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command | |
SC-07 | Boundary Protection | mitigates | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
action.hacking.variety.Abuse of functionality | Abuse of functionality. | related-to | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
defender_for_containers | Microsoft Defender for Containers | technique_scores | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This capability can detect abuse of container administration services.
References
|
defender_for_containers | Microsoft Defender for Containers | technique_scores | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This capability can protect against abuse of container administration services.
References
|
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
gke_enterprise | GKE Enterprise | technique_scores | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
GKE Enterprise incorporates the Anthos Config Management feature to create and manage Kubernetes objects across multiple clusters at once. PodSecurityPolicies can be enforced to prevent Pods from using the root Linux user and prevents pods from running privileged containers. In hindsight this can ensure containers are not running as root by default.
References
|
google_kubernetes_engine | Google Kubernetes Engine | technique_scores | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
This control may provide provide information about vulnerabilities within container images, such as the risk from remote management of a deployed container. With the right permissions, an adversary could escalate to remote code execution in the Kubernetes cluster.
References
|
Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
aws_config | AWS Config | technique_scores | T1609 | Container Administration Command |
Comments
The "eks-endpoint-no-public-access" managed rule can identify whether Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) endpoints are misconfigured to allow public endpoint access, which should be fixed in order to prevent malicious external access to the Kubernetes API server, including malicious attempts to execute commands via the API. It is run periodically and only provides partial coverage because it is specific to public access, resulting in an overall score of Partial.
References
|