T1134 Access Token Manipulation

Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token.

An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. Token Impersonation/Theft) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. Create Process with Token). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation)

Any standard user can use the <code>runas</code> command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.

View in MITRE ATT&CK®

CRI Profile Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
PR.AA-05.02 Privileged system access Mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
Comments
This diagnostic statement protects against Access Token Manipulation through the use of privileged account management and the use of multi-factor authentication.
References
    DE.CM-06.02 Third-party access monitoring Mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
    Comments
    This diagnostic statement protects against Access Token Manipulation through the use of privileged account management. Employing auditing, privilege access management, and just in time access protects against adversaries trying to obtain illicit access to critical systems.
    References
      PR.AA-05.01 Access privilege limitation Mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
      Comments
      This diagnostic statement describes the implementation of least privilege principle, which can be applied to limiting permissions through role-based access controls, file and directory permissions, and the execution of systems and services. An adversary must already have high-level, admin or root level access on a local system to make full use of these ATT&CK techniques. Restrict users and accounts to the least privileges they require can help mitigate these techniques.
      References
        PR.AA-01.02 Physical and logical access Mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
        Comments
        This diagnostic statement describes how the organization ensures users are identified and authenticated before accessing systems, applications, and hardware, with logical access controls permitting access only to authorized individuals with legitimate business needs. Logical access controls in relation to systems can refer to the use of MFA, user account management, and other role-based access control mechanisms to enforce policies for authentication and authorization of user accounts.
        References
          PR.IR-01.06 Production environment segregation Mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
          Comments
          This diagnostic statement provides protections for production environments. Measures such as network segmentation and access control reduce the attack surface, restrict movement by adversaries, and protect critical assets and data from compromise.
          References
            PR.AA-01.01 Identity and credential management Mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
            Comments
            This diagnostic statement protects against Access Token Manipulation through the use of hardened access control policies, secure defaults, password complexity requirements, multifactor authentication requirements, and removal of terminated accounts.
            References

              NIST 800-53 Mappings

              Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
              IA-13 Identity Providers and Authorization Servers mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              CM-06 Configuration Settings mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              CM-05 Access Restrictions for Change mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              IA-02 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              AC-02 Account Management mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              AC-03 Access Enforcement mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              AC-05 Separation of Duties mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              AC-06 Least Privilege mitigates T1134 Access Token Manipulation

              VERIS Mappings

              Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
              action.hacking.variety.Unknown Unknown related-to T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              action.hacking.variety.Use of stolen creds Use of stolen or default authentication credentials (including credential stuffing) related-to T1134 Access Token Manipulation

              Azure Mappings

              Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
              alerts_for_windows_machines Alerts for Windows Machines technique_scores T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              Comments
              This control can detect when commands associated with this technique are executed, such as runas.
              References
              defender_for_app_service Microsoft Defender for Cloud: Defender for App Service technique_scores T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              Comments
              This control analyzes host data to detect execution of known malicious PowerShell PowerSploit cmdlets. This covers execution of this technique via the Invoke-TokenManipulation module on Windows, but does not address other procedures or platforms, and temporal factor is unknown, resulting in a Minimal score.
              References

              GCP Mappings

              Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
              google_secops Google Security Operations technique_scores T1134 Access Token Manipulation
              Comments
              Google Security Ops is able to trigger an alert based on modifications to user access controls. This technique was scored as minimal based on low or uncertain detection coverage factor. https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules/blob/783e0e5947774785db1c55041b70176deeca6f46/soc_prime_rules/cloud_security/sysmon/suspicious_command_line_contains_azure_tokencache_dat_as_argument__via_cmdline.yaral
              References

              ATT&CK Subtechniques

              Technique ID Technique Name Number of Mappings
              T1134.002 Create Process with Token 13
              T1134.001 Token Impersonation/Theft 14
              T1134.003 Make and Impersonate Token 15
              T1134.005 SID-History Injection 15