T1071.001 Web Protocols Mappings

Adversaries may communicate using application layer protocols associated with web traffic to avoid detection/network filtering by blending in with existing traffic. Commands to the remote system, and often the results of those commands, will be embedded within the protocol traffic between the client and server.

Protocols such as HTTP/S(Citation: CrowdStrike Putter Panda) and WebSocket(Citation: Brazking-Websockets) that carry web traffic may be very common in environments. HTTP/S packets have many fields and headers in which data can be concealed. An adversary may abuse these protocols to communicate with systems under their control within a victim network while also mimicking normal, expected traffic.

View in MITRE ATT&CK®

NIST 800-53 Mappings

VERIS Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
action.hacking.variety.Other Other related-to T1071.001 Web Protocols
action.hacking.vector.Command shell Remote shell related-to T1071.001 Web Protocols
action.malware.vector.Email attachment Email via user-executed attachment. Child of 'Email' related-to T1071.001 Web Protocols

GCP Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
chrome_enterprise_premium Chrome Enterprise Premium technique_scores T1071.001 Web Protocols
Comments
Chrome Enterprise Premium provides checks for sensitive data and protection from content that may contain malware. This also enables certain files to be sent for analysis, and in return the admin can then choose to allow or block uploads and downloads for those scanned and unscanned files. End users can also be prevented from accessing pages specified by a list of URL patterns.
References
google_secops Google Security Operations technique_scores T1071.001 Web Protocols
Comments
Google Security Ops is able to trigger an alert based on system events of interest, for example: detection of the Sunburst C2 channel used as backdoor access in the SolarWinds compromise. This technique was scored as minimal based on low or uncertain detection coverage factor. https://github.com/chronicle/detection-rules/blob/783e0e5947774785db1c55041b70176deeca6f46/soc_prime_rules/ioc_sigma/dns/solarwinds_backdoor_c2_host_name_detected___via_dns.yaral
References

AWS Mappings

Capability ID Capability Description Mapping Type ATT&CK ID ATT&CK Name Notes
amazon_guardduty Amazon GuardDuty technique_scores T1071.001 Web Protocols
Comments
GuardDuty flags events matching the following finding types that relate to adversaries attempting to communicate using application layer protocols to avoid detection. UnauthorizedAccess:EC2/MaliciousIPCaller.Custom Backdoor:EC2/C&CActivity.B Backdoor:EC2/C&CActivity.B!DNS Trojan:EC2/BlackholeTraffic Trojan:EC2/BlackholeTraffic!DNS Trojan:EC2/DropPoint Trojan:EC2/DropPoint!DNS Backdoor:EC2/C&CActivity.B Impact:EC2/MaliciousDomainRequest.Reputation Impact:EC2/SuspiciousDomainRequest.Reputation
References
    aws_network_firewall AWS Network Firewall technique_scores T1071.001 Web Protocols
    Comments
    AWS Network Firewall has the ability to pass, drop, or alert on traffic based on the network protocol as well as perform deep packet inspection on the payload. This functionality can be used to block malicious or unwanted traffic leveraging application layer protocols. As a result, this mapping is given a score of Significant.
    References
      aws_web_application_firewall AWS Web Application Firewall technique_scores T1071.001 Web Protocols
      Comments
      AWS WAF protects against this by inspecting incoming requests and blocking malicious traffic. AWS WAF uses the following rule sets to provide this protection. AWSManagedRulesCommonRuleSet AWSManagedRulesAdminProtectionRuleSet AWSManagedRulesKnownBadInputsRuleSet AWSManagedRulesSQLiRuleSet AWSManagedRulesLinuxRuleSet AWSManagedRulesUnixRuleSet AWSManagedRulesWindowsRuleSet AWSManagedRulesPHPRuleSet AWSManagedRulesWordPressRuleSet AWSManagedRulesBotControlRuleSet This is scored as Minimal because the rule sets only protect against the web protocols sub-technique.
      References