Adversaries may use an existing, legitimate external Web service as a means for relaying data to/from a compromised system. Popular websites and social media acting as a mechanism for C2 may give a significant amount of cover due to the likelihood that hosts within a network are already communicating with them prior to a compromise. Using common services, such as those offered by Google or Twitter, makes it easier for adversaries to hide in expected noise. Web service providers commonly use SSL/TLS encryption, giving adversaries an added level of protection.
Use of Web services may also protect back-end C2 infrastructure from discovery through malware binary analysis while also enabling operational resiliency (since this infrastructure may be dynamically changed).
View in MITRE ATT&CK®Capability ID | Capability Description | Mapping Type | ATT&CK ID | ATT&CK Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
AC-4 | Information Flow Enforcement | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
CA-7 | Continuous Monitoring | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
CM-2 | Baseline Configuration | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
CM-6 | Configuration Settings | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
CM-7 | Least Functionality | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
SC-7 | Boundary Protection | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
SI-3 | Malicious Code Protection | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
SI-4 | System Monitoring | Protects | T1102 | Web Service |
azure_sentinel | Azure Sentinel | technique_scores | T1102 | Web Service |
Technique ID | Technique Name | Number of Mappings |
---|---|---|
T1102.002 | Bidirectional Communication | 9 |
T1102.001 | Dead Drop Resolver | 8 |
T1102.003 | One-Way Communication | 8 |